A person’s financial situation is often desperate by the time a bankruptcy is filed. In some circumstances the rent is past due and the debtor is facing eviction. Fortunately, the bankruptcy laws can help many debtors stay in their homes, at least temporarily.
Generally, when you file a bankruptcy petition all collection actions are automatically stayed. The purpose of this stay is to give you some breathing room and time to sort out your financial difficulties. If you are behind on rent payments, the bankruptcy automatic stays the commencement or continuation of an eviction action. The automatic stay prohibits your landlord from any attempt to collect rents that accrued prior to the bankruptcy filing date. Your landlord may not write or call you in an effort to collect these rents, and may not start or continue a lawsuit to evict you.
The bankruptcy automatic stay will not relieve you from your obligation to pay rent after the bankruptcy filing date. If you fall behind on your rent payments after the bankruptcy is filed, your landlord may evict you regardless of the bankruptcy, but cannot seek payment of past rents. If you are not behind on rents at the time the bankruptcy case is filed, your landlord is not a creditor and will not receive notice of your bankruptcy filing. However, you must account for any rent deposit on your bankruptcy schedules.
In some circumstances a landlord may complain to the bankruptcy court that the tenant is endangering the property or using controlled substances illegally on the property. The landlord must file a certification to the bankruptcy court and the tenant has 15 days to respond. The court must hold a hearing within 10 days. If the landlord is successful in this complaint, the court will lift the automatic stay and allow the eviction process to continue.
If your landlord has obtained a judgment for possession and order of eviction before you file bankruptcy, the legal process is more complex. You must deposit one month of rent to the bankruptcy court immediately upon filing the bankruptcy petition along with a certification stating that your landlord’s judgment permits you to stay in the premises upon satisfaction of the entire judgment amount. This filing stays the eviction process for thirty days. If you wish to remain longer, the amount stated in the judgment for possession must be paid within the thirty day period.
Bankruptcy can stop an eviction and give you time to move or make arrangements to stay. If you are facing eviction from your rental home and contemplating bankruptcy, discuss your situation with an experienced bankruptcy attorney.
Showing posts with label bankruptcy atttorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bankruptcy atttorney. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Buying A Car During Bankruptcy
There are a surprising number of options for a debtor to retain possession of a vehicle during bankruptcy. Choosing the best option depends on several factors including your ability to pay and the condition of your vehicle. In some cases the best financial option is to surrender your vehicle back to the bank and purchase a different one.
Years ago it was unheard of for a debtor in an active bankruptcy to obtain an auto loan. Several years ago two companies, 722 Redemption Funding, and Fresh Start Loan Corporation, began making auto loans to debtors in bankruptcy, and now many banks have lending programs for debtors. The attitude towards bankruptcy has changed and many debtors are evaluated more on their future ability to pay the loan rather than their past financial trouble.
Obtaining an auto loan during bankruptcy is a matter of showing stable income, a good debt-to-income ratio, and some assurance that your current financial trouble is unusual and not likely to reoccur. All lenders require a loan application and the criteria for approval can vary significantly. Some lenders will not approve a loan if you have had a prior repossession. Other lenders want a substantial down payment. New auto loans often want the bankruptcy discharged before approving the loan. In all cases your vehicle choice will be restricted to a newer vehicle with low miles.
During a Chapter 7 bankruptcy the debtor and the lender are free to negotiate terms outside of the bankruptcy case. The loan is not a part of the case and is not affected by the bankruptcy discharge. For Chapter 13 debtors, any new indebtedness must be approved by the trustee and the court. In most cases the Chapter 13 debtor can obtain approval after a showing of need and ability to pay.
If you are considering bankruptcy and need to buy a different vehicle, consult with an experienced attorney. There are many different options during bankruptcy for retaining, refinancing, or purchasing a different vehicle. Call today and get the information you need to drive your financial future.
Years ago it was unheard of for a debtor in an active bankruptcy to obtain an auto loan. Several years ago two companies, 722 Redemption Funding, and Fresh Start Loan Corporation, began making auto loans to debtors in bankruptcy, and now many banks have lending programs for debtors. The attitude towards bankruptcy has changed and many debtors are evaluated more on their future ability to pay the loan rather than their past financial trouble.
Obtaining an auto loan during bankruptcy is a matter of showing stable income, a good debt-to-income ratio, and some assurance that your current financial trouble is unusual and not likely to reoccur. All lenders require a loan application and the criteria for approval can vary significantly. Some lenders will not approve a loan if you have had a prior repossession. Other lenders want a substantial down payment. New auto loans often want the bankruptcy discharged before approving the loan. In all cases your vehicle choice will be restricted to a newer vehicle with low miles.
During a Chapter 7 bankruptcy the debtor and the lender are free to negotiate terms outside of the bankruptcy case. The loan is not a part of the case and is not affected by the bankruptcy discharge. For Chapter 13 debtors, any new indebtedness must be approved by the trustee and the court. In most cases the Chapter 13 debtor can obtain approval after a showing of need and ability to pay.
If you are considering bankruptcy and need to buy a different vehicle, consult with an experienced attorney. There are many different options during bankruptcy for retaining, refinancing, or purchasing a different vehicle. Call today and get the information you need to drive your financial future.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Are People In Need Avoiding Bankruptcy?
Although bankruptcy filings are climbing back to the all-time high of 2 million reached in 2005, there is a growing concern that many Americans in need of bankruptcy protection are not filing. A recent article in USA Today quotes Katherine Porter, associate professor of law at the University of Iowa who says, “[T]he filing rate doesn’t even begin to count the depth of financial pain.”
Are you hurting financially? Bankruptcy can help ease that pain.
Bankruptcy is a federal legal process for declaring an inability to pay your creditors. When you file bankruptcy you get immediate relief. The bankruptcy court imposes an “automatic stay” prohibiting creditors from taking collection action against you while the bankruptcy case is pending. The automatic stay is very powerful and stops lawsuits, wage garnishments, and even foreclosures. Its purpose is to give the debtor some breathing room and an opportunity to decide how to resolve an overwhelming debt problem.
There are typically two different types of bankruptcy cases: chapter 7 and chapter 13. In chapter 7 you eliminate debt without payment while chapter 13 is a repayment plan over three to five years. At the end of a bankruptcy case the court enters an order discharging eligible debts and permanently prohibits creditors from taking collection action against you.
In some cases certain debts are not discharged. The most common types are family support obligations, student loans, and taxes. However, bankruptcy offers significant relief by discharging other debts and freeing up money to pay the non-discharged debt. Chapter 13 can also be helpful by allowing payment of the non-dischargeable debt under the supervision of the bankruptcy court and without fear of lawsuits, wage garnishments, or other nasty creditor action.
The bankruptcy process is very efficient. For most chapter 7 debtors the case will last a few months and requires one meeting with the bankruptcy trustee. The cost of bankruptcy is very reasonable compared to the relief that is given.
If you are hurting financially, speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you. There are many options available in the law and can give you real relief from overwhelming debt.
Are you hurting financially? Bankruptcy can help ease that pain.
Bankruptcy is a federal legal process for declaring an inability to pay your creditors. When you file bankruptcy you get immediate relief. The bankruptcy court imposes an “automatic stay” prohibiting creditors from taking collection action against you while the bankruptcy case is pending. The automatic stay is very powerful and stops lawsuits, wage garnishments, and even foreclosures. Its purpose is to give the debtor some breathing room and an opportunity to decide how to resolve an overwhelming debt problem.
There are typically two different types of bankruptcy cases: chapter 7 and chapter 13. In chapter 7 you eliminate debt without payment while chapter 13 is a repayment plan over three to five years. At the end of a bankruptcy case the court enters an order discharging eligible debts and permanently prohibits creditors from taking collection action against you.
In some cases certain debts are not discharged. The most common types are family support obligations, student loans, and taxes. However, bankruptcy offers significant relief by discharging other debts and freeing up money to pay the non-discharged debt. Chapter 13 can also be helpful by allowing payment of the non-dischargeable debt under the supervision of the bankruptcy court and without fear of lawsuits, wage garnishments, or other nasty creditor action.
The bankruptcy process is very efficient. For most chapter 7 debtors the case will last a few months and requires one meeting with the bankruptcy trustee. The cost of bankruptcy is very reasonable compared to the relief that is given.
If you are hurting financially, speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you. There are many options available in the law and can give you real relief from overwhelming debt.
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Statement of Intention
The Bankruptcy Code directs the Chapter 7 debtor to file a statement of intention with the bankruptcy court within 30 days after the petition filing, or on or before the 341 Meeting of Creditors, whichever is earlier. A statement of intention advises the court, the bankruptcy trustee, and your creditors of how the debtor intends to treat secured collateral, like a car or home, in the bankruptcy.
The Bankruptcy Code also requires that the Chapter 7 debtor perform on that intention within 45 days after filing the statement. The Bankruptcy Code allows the debtor to choose one of the following: (1) surrender the collateral back to the creditor and discharge any personal liability; (2) reaffirm the debt and retain the collateral in exchange for continued personal liability on the original debt; or (3) redeem the collateral by paying the current fair market value in a lump sum.
Prior to the overhaul of the Bankruptcy Code in 2005, a Chapter 7 statement of intention had little relevance. Now the statement of intention can mean the difference between keeping and losing an automobile or other secured property.
Failure to timely file or perform on a statement of intention causes the automatic stay to be lifted and the property is longer a part of the bankruptcy case. In some cases, a purchase agreement may contain an ipso facto clause which creates a default on the loan by filing bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code expressly nullifies ipso facto clauses, but only for property of the bankruptcy estate. Most courts find that ipso facto clauses are enforceable under state law when property is no longer a part of the bankruptcy estate.
Let me restate this situation in plain English: if you file bankruptcy and do not file or timely perform on a statement of intention, the property is no longer protected by the bankruptcy and can be repossessed by the creditor, even though you are current on the loan. This situation recently was discussed in a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case, Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Company.
If you have an auto loan or other secured item you want to keep, discuss your options with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Your attorney can help you reach the right decision for you and your family.
The Bankruptcy Code also requires that the Chapter 7 debtor perform on that intention within 45 days after filing the statement. The Bankruptcy Code allows the debtor to choose one of the following: (1) surrender the collateral back to the creditor and discharge any personal liability; (2) reaffirm the debt and retain the collateral in exchange for continued personal liability on the original debt; or (3) redeem the collateral by paying the current fair market value in a lump sum.
Prior to the overhaul of the Bankruptcy Code in 2005, a Chapter 7 statement of intention had little relevance. Now the statement of intention can mean the difference between keeping and losing an automobile or other secured property.
Failure to timely file or perform on a statement of intention causes the automatic stay to be lifted and the property is longer a part of the bankruptcy case. In some cases, a purchase agreement may contain an ipso facto clause which creates a default on the loan by filing bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code expressly nullifies ipso facto clauses, but only for property of the bankruptcy estate. Most courts find that ipso facto clauses are enforceable under state law when property is no longer a part of the bankruptcy estate.
Let me restate this situation in plain English: if you file bankruptcy and do not file or timely perform on a statement of intention, the property is no longer protected by the bankruptcy and can be repossessed by the creditor, even though you are current on the loan. This situation recently was discussed in a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case, Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Company.
If you have an auto loan or other secured item you want to keep, discuss your options with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Your attorney can help you reach the right decision for you and your family.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Non-Dischargeable Debts in Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy is a federal legal process for declaring an inability of an individual or organization to pay its creditors. The United States Constitution authorizes the bankruptcy laws and federal laws govern all bankruptcy cases.
One stated purpose of the federal bankruptcy laws is to give the debtor a financial "fresh start." At the end of most cases the bankruptcy judge will discharge certain debts and release the debtor from personal liability.
The bankruptcy laws are meant to give the honest debtor a fresh start, but not a head start. Therefore, Congress has identified certain debts that cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy. Many debts that would ordinarily qualify for discharge may be determined as non-dischargeable if a debtor has committed a crime or fraud in acquiring the debt. Other debts are deemed generally non-dischargeable based on public policy reasons (like taxes or child support).
Generally, the following are non-dischargeable debts:
1. child support or alimony obligations, and debts considered in the nature of support;
2. student loans, unless repayment would cause you undue hardship;
3. criminal fines or restitution;
4. debts listed in a prior bankruptcy where debtor was denied a discharge;
5. recent income taxes less than three years past due; and
6. auto accident claims involving intoxication.
Additionally, there are circumstances which may make a debt non-dischargeable:
1. debts incurred on the basis of fraud;
2. debts from willful or malicious injury to another or another's property;
3. recent purchases with credit cards;
4. debts from larceny (theft), breach of trust or embezzlement; and
5. most federal, state and local taxes and any money borrowed on a credit card to pay those taxes.
All of the categories of non-dischargeable debts in bankruptcy have specific rules and exceptions and each situation has its own challenges. If you have a debt that may fall into a non-dischargeable category, discuss your situation with a qualified bankruptcy attorney and learn your options. Your attorney can provide options for managing, repaying, or discharging the debt.
One stated purpose of the federal bankruptcy laws is to give the debtor a financial "fresh start." At the end of most cases the bankruptcy judge will discharge certain debts and release the debtor from personal liability.
The bankruptcy laws are meant to give the honest debtor a fresh start, but not a head start. Therefore, Congress has identified certain debts that cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy. Many debts that would ordinarily qualify for discharge may be determined as non-dischargeable if a debtor has committed a crime or fraud in acquiring the debt. Other debts are deemed generally non-dischargeable based on public policy reasons (like taxes or child support).
Generally, the following are non-dischargeable debts:
1. child support or alimony obligations, and debts considered in the nature of support;
2. student loans, unless repayment would cause you undue hardship;
3. criminal fines or restitution;
4. debts listed in a prior bankruptcy where debtor was denied a discharge;
5. recent income taxes less than three years past due; and
6. auto accident claims involving intoxication.
Additionally, there are circumstances which may make a debt non-dischargeable:
1. debts incurred on the basis of fraud;
2. debts from willful or malicious injury to another or another's property;
3. recent purchases with credit cards;
4. debts from larceny (theft), breach of trust or embezzlement; and
5. most federal, state and local taxes and any money borrowed on a credit card to pay those taxes.
All of the categories of non-dischargeable debts in bankruptcy have specific rules and exceptions and each situation has its own challenges. If you have a debt that may fall into a non-dischargeable category, discuss your situation with a qualified bankruptcy attorney and learn your options. Your attorney can provide options for managing, repaying, or discharging the debt.
Monday, May 10, 2010
The War On Error: Bankruptcy Attorneys Take Aim Against MERS
Around the country courts are questioning the standing of MERS to assert legal rights in foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings. Many courts are finding that Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or “MERS,” is not a legal mortgage holder for lenders, investors and their loan servicers, and are invalidating bankruptcy claims or foreclosure processes.
On its website MERS describes itself:
"MERS is an innovative process that simplifies the way mortgage ownership and servicing rights are originated, sold and tracked. Created by the real estate finance industry, MERS eliminates the need to prepare and record assignments when trading residential and commercial mortgage loans."
Since the mortgage bubble burst, MERS has come under increasing attack in state and federal courts. Some courts (most notably in Kansas, Florida, and New York) have found that MERS does not have standing to assert mortgage rights because it is a mere nominee, and not a mortgage assignee (an assignment of a mortgage without the debt transfers nothing. 55 Am. Jur. 2d, Mortgages § 1002). Additionally, MERS routinely skips legally required processes when a mortgage is transferred.
MERS is not the beneficiary of a Deed of Trust, and has no ownership or possession of a promissory note. Therefore, many courts are finding noncompliance with state laws. Recently one bankruptcy court in the State of New York invalidated a bankruptcy claim by MERS when the company could not show how it had standing in the case.
Many bankruptcy attorneys are demanding proof of assignment and documents establishing a paper trail for their client’s mortgage. In many cases MERS is unable to provide this information; much like collection companies often cannot prove a debt. Original documents, recorded deeds, payment history, and executed assignments seem to be inconsequential matters to the MERS powerhouse. Fortunately, MERS is now under attack and accused of not following legal processes. It will be very interesting to see how the state and federal appellate courts address the MERS debacle.
If you are dealing with an uncooperative mortgage company and need assistance saving your home, speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discuss your options. There are many legal options available and your bankruptcy attorney can help you determine the best choice for your family.
On its website MERS describes itself:
"MERS is an innovative process that simplifies the way mortgage ownership and servicing rights are originated, sold and tracked. Created by the real estate finance industry, MERS eliminates the need to prepare and record assignments when trading residential and commercial mortgage loans."
Since the mortgage bubble burst, MERS has come under increasing attack in state and federal courts. Some courts (most notably in Kansas, Florida, and New York) have found that MERS does not have standing to assert mortgage rights because it is a mere nominee, and not a mortgage assignee (an assignment of a mortgage without the debt transfers nothing. 55 Am. Jur. 2d, Mortgages § 1002). Additionally, MERS routinely skips legally required processes when a mortgage is transferred.
MERS is not the beneficiary of a Deed of Trust, and has no ownership or possession of a promissory note. Therefore, many courts are finding noncompliance with state laws. Recently one bankruptcy court in the State of New York invalidated a bankruptcy claim by MERS when the company could not show how it had standing in the case.
Many bankruptcy attorneys are demanding proof of assignment and documents establishing a paper trail for their client’s mortgage. In many cases MERS is unable to provide this information; much like collection companies often cannot prove a debt. Original documents, recorded deeds, payment history, and executed assignments seem to be inconsequential matters to the MERS powerhouse. Fortunately, MERS is now under attack and accused of not following legal processes. It will be very interesting to see how the state and federal appellate courts address the MERS debacle.
If you are dealing with an uncooperative mortgage company and need assistance saving your home, speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discuss your options. There are many legal options available and your bankruptcy attorney can help you determine the best choice for your family.
Friday, May 7, 2010
Can I Keep My House If I File Bankruptcy?
One of the most common and important questions asked by a client during the initial bankruptcy consultation is, “Can I keep my house?”
The happy answer is, “Yes.” However, every client’s case is different and requires a skilled and experience attorney to evaluate your situation and help you choose the appropriate debt relief process.
The first question is whether there is equity in your home. Every state allows the debtor to exempt home equity from creditors during bankruptcy. Home equity is simply the difference between the amount that is owed and what the property is worth. If you have more equity in your home than can be exempted, you may need to consider either a Chapter 13 repayment plan or a non-bankruptcy option for debt repayment. In a Chapter 13 the debtor pays the amount equal to the non-exempt home equity to unsecured creditors (like credit cards and medical bills) over a three to five year period. If Chapter 13 is not a feasible option, the debtor may want to consider borrowing against the home equity to pay unsecured creditors.
The second issue is whether you can afford to keep the home by making the monthly payments. A home mortgage is a secured debt which must be paid or you must surrender the property back to the mortgage holder. When circumstances have changed and you can no loner afford to keep your home, the bankruptcy laws can help you to leave on your terms without any lingering debt.
In some cases a third issue is present: the debt is more than the value of the house. In those cases bankruptcy may help either through lien stripping an entirely unsecured second mortgage, or by encouraging the mortgage holder to negotiate for a modification and reduction in principle. Typically the mortgage holder does not want your property, and is usually willing to discuss payment options once a bankruptcy case is filed.
Finally, some debtors are facing foreclosure from an uncooperative mortgage holder. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy can be used to force the mortgage holder to accept payments that cure mortgage arrears over three to five years.
There are many options available for saving your home. Your bankruptcy attorney can discuss the pros and cons of each and help you decide which option is best for your family. Use the federal law to your advantage and discover how the bankruptcy laws can help you keep your home.
The happy answer is, “Yes.” However, every client’s case is different and requires a skilled and experience attorney to evaluate your situation and help you choose the appropriate debt relief process.
The first question is whether there is equity in your home. Every state allows the debtor to exempt home equity from creditors during bankruptcy. Home equity is simply the difference between the amount that is owed and what the property is worth. If you have more equity in your home than can be exempted, you may need to consider either a Chapter 13 repayment plan or a non-bankruptcy option for debt repayment. In a Chapter 13 the debtor pays the amount equal to the non-exempt home equity to unsecured creditors (like credit cards and medical bills) over a three to five year period. If Chapter 13 is not a feasible option, the debtor may want to consider borrowing against the home equity to pay unsecured creditors.
The second issue is whether you can afford to keep the home by making the monthly payments. A home mortgage is a secured debt which must be paid or you must surrender the property back to the mortgage holder. When circumstances have changed and you can no loner afford to keep your home, the bankruptcy laws can help you to leave on your terms without any lingering debt.
In some cases a third issue is present: the debt is more than the value of the house. In those cases bankruptcy may help either through lien stripping an entirely unsecured second mortgage, or by encouraging the mortgage holder to negotiate for a modification and reduction in principle. Typically the mortgage holder does not want your property, and is usually willing to discuss payment options once a bankruptcy case is filed.
Finally, some debtors are facing foreclosure from an uncooperative mortgage holder. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy can be used to force the mortgage holder to accept payments that cure mortgage arrears over three to five years.
There are many options available for saving your home. Your bankruptcy attorney can discuss the pros and cons of each and help you decide which option is best for your family. Use the federal law to your advantage and discover how the bankruptcy laws can help you keep your home.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Bankruptcy Cases Per Capita
Nevada, Tennessee, and Georgia are the highest per capita states for bankruptcy filings according recently released data concerning the first quarter of 2010. Records from the Automated Access to Court Electronic Records show there were 378,990 total bankruptcies in the first quarter of 2010, up from 325,815 in the first quarter of 2009.
In Nevada residents filed 10.3 bankruptcies per 1,000 residents for the first quarter of 2010. Tennessee and Georgia filed 8.0 and 7.8 respectively. Alaska is the state with the lowest per capita filing with 1.5 filings per 1,000 residents. According to these statistics the average Nevadan is almost seven times more likely to file bankruptcy than the average Alaskan.
Below is a list of the state’s bankruptcy filings per capita:
1. Nevada 10.3
2. Tennessee 8.0
3. Georgia 7.8
4. Michigan 7.4
5. Alabama 7.1
6. Indiana 7.0
7. California 6.4
8. Illinois 6.4
9. Kentucky 6.1
10. Ohio 5.9
11. Colorado 5.9
12. Utah 5.8
13. Arizona 5.6
14. Arkansas 5.6
15. Florida 5.6
16. Wisconsin 5.3
17. Rhode Island 5.2
18. Missouri 5.1
19. Delaware 5.1
20. Mississippi 5.0
21. Maryland 5.0
22. Washington 4.9
23. Oregon 4.8
24. Virginia 4.7
25. New Jersey 4.5
26. New Hampshire 4.5
27. Idaho 4.4
28. Nebraska 4.3
29. Minnesota 4.2
30. Louisiana 3.9
31. Oklahoma 3.8
32. West Virginia 3.7
33. Kansas 3.6
34. Massachusetts 3.5
35. New Mexico 3.3
36. Iowa 3.3
37. Connecticut 3.2
38. Pennsylvania 3.0
39. Maine 2.9
40. Vermont 2.9
41. Hawaii 2.9
42. North Carolina 2.8
43. Montana 2.7
44. New York 2.7
45. Wyoming 2.5
46. Texas 2.2
47. South Dakota 2.2
48. North Dakota 2.2
49. District of Columbia 2.1
50. South Carolina 2.1
51. Alaska 1.5
If you are considering a personal bankruptcy, you are not alone! In this tough economy, many families file bankruptcy to relieve them from the pressures of overwhelming debt and to begin their fresh start to a brighter financial future. Have your case evaluated today from an experienced attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you.
In Nevada residents filed 10.3 bankruptcies per 1,000 residents for the first quarter of 2010. Tennessee and Georgia filed 8.0 and 7.8 respectively. Alaska is the state with the lowest per capita filing with 1.5 filings per 1,000 residents. According to these statistics the average Nevadan is almost seven times more likely to file bankruptcy than the average Alaskan.
Below is a list of the state’s bankruptcy filings per capita:
1. Nevada 10.3
2. Tennessee 8.0
3. Georgia 7.8
4. Michigan 7.4
5. Alabama 7.1
6. Indiana 7.0
7. California 6.4
8. Illinois 6.4
9. Kentucky 6.1
10. Ohio 5.9
11. Colorado 5.9
12. Utah 5.8
13. Arizona 5.6
14. Arkansas 5.6
15. Florida 5.6
16. Wisconsin 5.3
17. Rhode Island 5.2
18. Missouri 5.1
19. Delaware 5.1
20. Mississippi 5.0
21. Maryland 5.0
22. Washington 4.9
23. Oregon 4.8
24. Virginia 4.7
25. New Jersey 4.5
26. New Hampshire 4.5
27. Idaho 4.4
28. Nebraska 4.3
29. Minnesota 4.2
30. Louisiana 3.9
31. Oklahoma 3.8
32. West Virginia 3.7
33. Kansas 3.6
34. Massachusetts 3.5
35. New Mexico 3.3
36. Iowa 3.3
37. Connecticut 3.2
38. Pennsylvania 3.0
39. Maine 2.9
40. Vermont 2.9
41. Hawaii 2.9
42. North Carolina 2.8
43. Montana 2.7
44. New York 2.7
45. Wyoming 2.5
46. Texas 2.2
47. South Dakota 2.2
48. North Dakota 2.2
49. District of Columbia 2.1
50. South Carolina 2.1
51. Alaska 1.5
If you are considering a personal bankruptcy, you are not alone! In this tough economy, many families file bankruptcy to relieve them from the pressures of overwhelming debt and to begin their fresh start to a brighter financial future. Have your case evaluated today from an experienced attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Meeting Your Bankruptcy Attorney
Many clients are intimidated when meeting a bankruptcy attorney for the first time. They fear that they will be asked judgmental questions and have to justify their financial distress. They fear that they will not be able to answer the attorney’s questions and somehow not qualify for bankruptcy and the relief they desperately need.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The first thing you will discover when meeting your bankruptcy attorney is that your attorney is a good listener. You are the world’s foremost expert concerning your own finances, and your attorney is there to learn about your case from you.
The second thing you will discover is your attorney’s compassion. Bankruptcy attorneys really do care about their clients. Bankruptcy is one of the few areas of the law where the legal process is designed to have a positive result for the client. The goal of your bankruptcy attorney is to ensure that you are in a better financial position at the end of the case than you were at the beginning. Bankruptcy lawyers are caring individuals that have an active interest in your future success.
The third thing you will notice is how your attorney is able to quickly summarize what seems like an overwhelming problem into simple concepts. Your attorney will break down your finances into four categories: assets, debts, income, and expenses. From there you and your attorney can discuss what must be done to improve your financial situation.
Finally, you will be impressed with the clarity your attorney has for repairing your financial problem. A skilled bankruptcy attorney spends years studying, training, and gaining practical experience just so your case can be resolved quickly and efficiently. Bankruptcy law is all about paths to recovery and your attorney will guide you along a path that is best for you.
When you first meet your bankruptcy attorney, discuss your case openly and honestly. You will find that your attorney is dedicated to helping you attain a financial fresh start and improve your family’s finances.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The first thing you will discover when meeting your bankruptcy attorney is that your attorney is a good listener. You are the world’s foremost expert concerning your own finances, and your attorney is there to learn about your case from you.
The second thing you will discover is your attorney’s compassion. Bankruptcy attorneys really do care about their clients. Bankruptcy is one of the few areas of the law where the legal process is designed to have a positive result for the client. The goal of your bankruptcy attorney is to ensure that you are in a better financial position at the end of the case than you were at the beginning. Bankruptcy lawyers are caring individuals that have an active interest in your future success.
The third thing you will notice is how your attorney is able to quickly summarize what seems like an overwhelming problem into simple concepts. Your attorney will break down your finances into four categories: assets, debts, income, and expenses. From there you and your attorney can discuss what must be done to improve your financial situation.
Finally, you will be impressed with the clarity your attorney has for repairing your financial problem. A skilled bankruptcy attorney spends years studying, training, and gaining practical experience just so your case can be resolved quickly and efficiently. Bankruptcy law is all about paths to recovery and your attorney will guide you along a path that is best for you.
When you first meet your bankruptcy attorney, discuss your case openly and honestly. You will find that your attorney is dedicated to helping you attain a financial fresh start and improve your family’s finances.
Friday, April 9, 2010
New Federal Guidelines Hope to Increase Home Modifications
In response to many criticisms of its Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), the Obama Administration recently announced significant changes intended to speed the modification process and clarify eligibility. Under the new guidelines, mortgage lenders must pursue early intervention to determine borrower eligibility under HAMP, and may not refer any loan to foreclosure until the borrower has been determined ineligible for the program. New timeframes have also been implemented and homeowners can expect a modification decision within 30 days.
The new HAMP guidelines require participating lenders to use principal reduction as a primary means of reducing borrowers’ payments where loans are more than 115 percent of the current home value. Borrowers that are current on their mortgages may qualify for refinancing at a low interest, fixed rate loan insured by the FHA, provided that the lender agrees to reduce the principal for the total combined debt to no more than 115 percent of the home’s value. This provision is meant to encourage lenders to reduce principle for those property owners with negative home equity.
Another important change is a clarification that debtors in bankruptcy must be considered for HAMP. A request for consideration for a modification while in bankruptcy may be made by the debtor, the debtor’s attorney, or by the bankruptcy trustee. This provides a yet another tool for the bankruptcy attorney to save a home mortgage from foreclosure and negotiate terms that the debtor can afford.
To qualify for a loan modification under HAMP, the borrower must:
The new HAMP guidelines require participating lenders to use principal reduction as a primary means of reducing borrowers’ payments where loans are more than 115 percent of the current home value. Borrowers that are current on their mortgages may qualify for refinancing at a low interest, fixed rate loan insured by the FHA, provided that the lender agrees to reduce the principal for the total combined debt to no more than 115 percent of the home’s value. This provision is meant to encourage lenders to reduce principle for those property owners with negative home equity.
Another important change is a clarification that debtors in bankruptcy must be considered for HAMP. A request for consideration for a modification while in bankruptcy may be made by the debtor, the debtor’s attorney, or by the bankruptcy trustee. This provides a yet another tool for the bankruptcy attorney to save a home mortgage from foreclosure and negotiate terms that the debtor can afford.
To qualify for a loan modification under HAMP, the borrower must:
- Be the owner-occupant of a one- to four-unit home;
- Have an unpaid principal balance that is equal to or less than $729,750 for a single-unit home (other limits apply for multi-unit homes);
- Have a first lien mortgage that was originated on or before January 1, 2009;
- Have a monthly mortgage payment (including taxes, insurance, and home owners association dues) greater than 31% of your monthly gross (pre-tax) income; and
- Have a mortgage payment that is not affordable due to a financial hardship that can be documented.
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Debtors Must Cooperate With the Bankruptcy Trustee
When a consumer bankruptcy case is filed, a trustee is appointed to oversee and administer the case. The trustee does not represent the interests of the debtor and cannot give legal advice, which is the role of your bankruptcy attorney. However, it is important to cooperate with the trustee and any request for information.
The issue of a debtor’s duty to cooperate with the trustee was recently litigated in the case of In re Royce Homes, LP. 2009 WL 3052439 (Bkrtcy. S.D.Tex.). In that Chapter 7 case the trustee requested financial documents and information from a corporate debtor. In response to the request the debtor provided access to “storage facilities containing stacks of documents and old computer servers, most of which are wholly unresponsive to the Trustee's request.” The trustee filed a motion asking the bankruptcy court to compel the debtor’s cooperation.
In deciding the matter the court cited several sections of the bankruptcy code and rules which require debtors to cooperate with the trustee. Notably section 521(a)(3) requires the Debtor to “cooperate with the trustee as necessary to enable the trustee to perform the trustee's duties under this title.” The court ordered the debtor to provide the specific information that the trustee had requested, rather than simply dumping documents or permitting access to records. The court emphasized the debtor’s duty to cooperate by stating, “It is well settled that a [trustee] should not be required to drag information from a reluctant and uncooperative debtor. Because of the extraordinary relief offered under the Bankruptcy Code delay and avoidance tactics are inconsistent with, and offensive to, its purpose and spirit.”
Cooperation with the trustee is an important part of the bankruptcy process. Failure to cooperate or to testify truthfully could result in a discharge, or worse. Your bankruptcy attorney can help guide you through this process of disclosure with the trustee and protect your interests.
The issue of a debtor’s duty to cooperate with the trustee was recently litigated in the case of In re Royce Homes, LP. 2009 WL 3052439 (Bkrtcy. S.D.Tex.). In that Chapter 7 case the trustee requested financial documents and information from a corporate debtor. In response to the request the debtor provided access to “storage facilities containing stacks of documents and old computer servers, most of which are wholly unresponsive to the Trustee's request.” The trustee filed a motion asking the bankruptcy court to compel the debtor’s cooperation.
In deciding the matter the court cited several sections of the bankruptcy code and rules which require debtors to cooperate with the trustee. Notably section 521(a)(3) requires the Debtor to “cooperate with the trustee as necessary to enable the trustee to perform the trustee's duties under this title.” The court ordered the debtor to provide the specific information that the trustee had requested, rather than simply dumping documents or permitting access to records. The court emphasized the debtor’s duty to cooperate by stating, “It is well settled that a [trustee] should not be required to drag information from a reluctant and uncooperative debtor. Because of the extraordinary relief offered under the Bankruptcy Code delay and avoidance tactics are inconsistent with, and offensive to, its purpose and spirit.”
Cooperation with the trustee is an important part of the bankruptcy process. Failure to cooperate or to testify truthfully could result in a discharge, or worse. Your bankruptcy attorney can help guide you through this process of disclosure with the trustee and protect your interests.
Friday, April 2, 2010
Changes in Law Make Bankruptcy More Accessible
Effective April 1, 2010, certain dollar limits contained in the Bankruptcy Code will be increased. A full comparison of the current and changed amounts can be found by following this link. These most meaningful changes to consumer bankruptcy cases are:
• An increase of the eligibility limit for Chapter 13 from $336, 900 to $360,475 in unsecured debt, and from $1,010,650 to
$1,081,400 in secured debt;
• The federal homestead exemption increases from $136,875 to $146,450; and
• The presumption of fraud for luxury items purchased with a credit card within 90 days of a bankruptcy filing increases from $550 to $600; and the presumption of fraud for credit card cash advances within 70 days of filing increases from $825 to $875.
Many other dollar amount increases will take effect on April 1, 2010, including increases to protected educational accounts, increasing restrictions to the bankruptcy trustee’s powers under certain circumstances, and increased protection for retirement accounts. In all, these increases will make the bankruptcy attorney’s job of protecting the consumer debtor a little easier, and make the bankruptcy process more accessible. Please note that these changes will only affect bankruptcy cases filed on or after April 1, 2010.
If you and your family struggle each month to pay bills, consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discuss your financial options. There are many repayment and “walk-away” options available under the Bankruptcy Code. Get the facts and don’t let debt ruin your life.
• An increase of the eligibility limit for Chapter 13 from $336, 900 to $360,475 in unsecured debt, and from $1,010,650 to
$1,081,400 in secured debt;
• The federal homestead exemption increases from $136,875 to $146,450; and
• The presumption of fraud for luxury items purchased with a credit card within 90 days of a bankruptcy filing increases from $550 to $600; and the presumption of fraud for credit card cash advances within 70 days of filing increases from $825 to $875.
Many other dollar amount increases will take effect on April 1, 2010, including increases to protected educational accounts, increasing restrictions to the bankruptcy trustee’s powers under certain circumstances, and increased protection for retirement accounts. In all, these increases will make the bankruptcy attorney’s job of protecting the consumer debtor a little easier, and make the bankruptcy process more accessible. Please note that these changes will only affect bankruptcy cases filed on or after April 1, 2010.
If you and your family struggle each month to pay bills, consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discuss your financial options. There are many repayment and “walk-away” options available under the Bankruptcy Code. Get the facts and don’t let debt ruin your life.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Can a Discharged Debt Be Repaid?
The Bankruptcy Code provides, “Nothing contained in. . . this section prevents a debtor from voluntarily repaying any debt.” 11 U.S.C. § 524(f). You are free to make voluntary payments on all or part of your discharged debts. These payments do not invalidate the discharge order and do not create a new legal obligation. The creditor is still prohibited from contacting you in any way and cannot take any collection action against you, including sending you a bill or even encouraging your continued payments. In this case the term “voluntary” means free from creditor influence or inducement.
Any payments you make on a discharged debt are the result of a moral obligation as the legal obligation to pay the debt has been discharged by the bankruptcy court. In a Chapter 7 case, you are free to pay whomever you want. “Debtors who file under [Chapter 7] can dispose of their post-petition earnings as they choose, including voluntary repayment of debts otherwise dischargeable in bankruptcy.” In re Hellums, 772 F.2d 379, 381 (7th Cir. 1985).
If you are interested in making voluntary repayments after your discharge, discuss the matter with your bankruptcy attorney. While there are generally few down-sides to voluntary repayment, your bankruptcy attorney can discuss the pros and cons with you and help you reach the right decision for you and your family.
Any payments you make on a discharged debt are the result of a moral obligation as the legal obligation to pay the debt has been discharged by the bankruptcy court. In a Chapter 7 case, you are free to pay whomever you want. “Debtors who file under [Chapter 7] can dispose of their post-petition earnings as they choose, including voluntary repayment of debts otherwise dischargeable in bankruptcy.” In re Hellums, 772 F.2d 379, 381 (7th Cir. 1985).
If you are interested in making voluntary repayments after your discharge, discuss the matter with your bankruptcy attorney. While there are generally few down-sides to voluntary repayment, your bankruptcy attorney can discuss the pros and cons with you and help you reach the right decision for you and your family.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Loading Up on Debt Prior to Bankruptcy
For most, the decision to file a bankruptcy is a tough choice. It is the final step in a long journey that has included great compromise and sacrifice. A person usually experiences a sense relief when deciding to file bankruptcy, and there may be a tendency to "let go" of your debt problem. Unfortunately, in some cases people will “let go” by recklessly spending money and running up credit card balances.
It is generally not a good idea to incur any new debt before a bankruptcy filing. The Bankruptcy Code has several provisions prohibiting the debtor from loading up on debt prior to filing bankruptcy. One of the most commonly cited is a spending spree prohibition against purchasing “luxury goods or services” totaling more than $550.00 within 90 days prior to filing a bankruptcy case. Another provision makes credit card cash advances presumptively non-dischargeable if taken within 70 days prior to the bankruptcy filing.
Recently the United States Supreme Court in Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United States reiterated that incurring new debt before bankruptcy with the intent to discharge the debt is not only prohibited, but may also amount to civil fraud or a criminal act. The high court said that bankruptcy attorneys cannot instruct or encourage debtors to take on more dischargeable debt before bankruptcy, but attorneys “remain free to talk fully and candidly about the incurrence of debt in contemplation of filing a bankruptcy case.”
There are many situations where taking on additional debt is beneficial and permissible. The Supreme Court cited three of those situations in the Milavetz opinion: (1) refinancing a mortgage; (2) purchasing a reliable car; and (3) incurring “additional debt to buy groceries, pay medical bills, or make other purchases ‘reasonably necessary for the support or maintenance of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor[.]’”
The bankruptcy process can relieve you of many financial worries. However, your path to financial recovery can be complicated without the sound advice from an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Don’t make any significant financial decisions prior to filing bankruptcy without consulting your attorney.
It is generally not a good idea to incur any new debt before a bankruptcy filing. The Bankruptcy Code has several provisions prohibiting the debtor from loading up on debt prior to filing bankruptcy. One of the most commonly cited is a spending spree prohibition against purchasing “luxury goods or services” totaling more than $550.00 within 90 days prior to filing a bankruptcy case. Another provision makes credit card cash advances presumptively non-dischargeable if taken within 70 days prior to the bankruptcy filing.
Recently the United States Supreme Court in Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United States reiterated that incurring new debt before bankruptcy with the intent to discharge the debt is not only prohibited, but may also amount to civil fraud or a criminal act. The high court said that bankruptcy attorneys cannot instruct or encourage debtors to take on more dischargeable debt before bankruptcy, but attorneys “remain free to talk fully and candidly about the incurrence of debt in contemplation of filing a bankruptcy case.”
There are many situations where taking on additional debt is beneficial and permissible. The Supreme Court cited three of those situations in the Milavetz opinion: (1) refinancing a mortgage; (2) purchasing a reliable car; and (3) incurring “additional debt to buy groceries, pay medical bills, or make other purchases ‘reasonably necessary for the support or maintenance of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor[.]’”
The bankruptcy process can relieve you of many financial worries. However, your path to financial recovery can be complicated without the sound advice from an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Don’t make any significant financial decisions prior to filing bankruptcy without consulting your attorney.
Loading Up on Debt Prior to Bankruptcy
For most, the decision to file a bankruptcy is a tough choice. It is the final step in a long journey that has included great compromise and sacrifice. A person usually experiences a sense relief when deciding to file bankruptcy, and there may be a tendency to "let go" of your debt problem. Unfortunately, in some cases people will “let go” by recklessly spending money and running up credit card balances.
It is generally not a good idea to incur any new debt before a bankruptcy filing. The Bankruptcy Code has several provisions prohibiting the debtor from loading up on debt prior to filing bankruptcy. One of the most commonly cited is a spending spree prohibition against purchasing “luxury goods or services” totaling more than $550.00 within 90 days prior to filing a bankruptcy case. Another provision makes credit card cash advances presumptively non-dischargeable if taken within 70 days prior to the bankruptcy filing.
Recently the United States Supreme Court in Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United States reiterated that incurring new debt before bankruptcy with the intent to discharge the debt is not only prohibited, but may also amount to civil fraud or a criminal act. The high court said that bankruptcy attorneys cannot instruct or encourage debtors to take on more dischargeable debt before bankruptcy, but attorneys “remain free to talk fully and candidly about the incurrence of debt in contemplation of filing a bankruptcy case.”
There are many situations where taking on additional debt is beneficial and permissible. The Supreme Court cited three of those situations in the Milavetz opinion: (1) refinancing a mortgage; (2) purchasing a reliable car; and (3) incurring “additional debt to buy groceries, pay medical bills, or make other purchases ‘reasonably necessary for the support or maintenance of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor[.]’”
The bankruptcy process can relieve you of many financial worries. However, your path to financial recovery can be complicated without the sound advice from an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Don’t make any significant financial decisions prior to filing bankruptcy without consulting your attorney.
It is generally not a good idea to incur any new debt before a bankruptcy filing. The Bankruptcy Code has several provisions prohibiting the debtor from loading up on debt prior to filing bankruptcy. One of the most commonly cited is a spending spree prohibition against purchasing “luxury goods or services” totaling more than $550.00 within 90 days prior to filing a bankruptcy case. Another provision makes credit card cash advances presumptively non-dischargeable if taken within 70 days prior to the bankruptcy filing.
Recently the United States Supreme Court in Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United States reiterated that incurring new debt before bankruptcy with the intent to discharge the debt is not only prohibited, but may also amount to civil fraud or a criminal act. The high court said that bankruptcy attorneys cannot instruct or encourage debtors to take on more dischargeable debt before bankruptcy, but attorneys “remain free to talk fully and candidly about the incurrence of debt in contemplation of filing a bankruptcy case.”
There are many situations where taking on additional debt is beneficial and permissible. The Supreme Court cited three of those situations in the Milavetz opinion: (1) refinancing a mortgage; (2) purchasing a reliable car; and (3) incurring “additional debt to buy groceries, pay medical bills, or make other purchases ‘reasonably necessary for the support or maintenance of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor[.]’”
The bankruptcy process can relieve you of many financial worries. However, your path to financial recovery can be complicated without the sound advice from an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Don’t make any significant financial decisions prior to filing bankruptcy without consulting your attorney.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Protecting Your Attorney Client Privilege in Bankruptcy
Most bankruptcy clients are aware of the attorney-client privilege, an evidentiary rule that protects confidential communications between an attorney and client. It encourages candid communication between clients and attorneys without fear that the discussion will be used against the client. This privilege belongs to the client and the client determines when to waive it. The privilege exists generally in every legal forum in the United States, however its application can vary.
In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, a trustee is appointed to administer the case and liquidate the debtor's nonexempt assets. In performing these duties it may become important for the trustee to have certain information and the trustee may seek to have the debtor’s attorney disclose information obtained during a confidential attorney client discussion.
To compel the disclosure of this information, the trustee may invoke section 542(e) of the Bankruptcy Code which states that “[s]ubject to any applicable privilege, after notice and a hearing, the court may order an attorney, accountant, or other person that holds recorded information. . . relating to the debtor’s property or financial affairs, to turn over or disclose such recorded information to the trustee.” In opposing this disclosure, the debtor may assert the attorney-client privilege and argue that the trustee does not have the power to waive this privilege.
Bankruptcy Courts have taken three different approaches to resolving the issue of whether the trustee can waive the attorney-client privilege: (1) the trustee can waive attorney-client privilege; (2) the attorney-client privilege is absolute and cannot be waived by the trustee; and (3) whether the trustee is entitled to waive the attorney-client privilege depends upon the circumstances in the case. Bankruptcy courts using this last test generally balance the benefit to the bankruptcy estate against the potential harm to the debtor. See In re Courtney, 372 B.R. 519 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007).
The bottom line is “let the client beware!” Discussions with your bankruptcy attorney, personal injury attorney, or other attorney may be subject to disclosure during your bankruptcy case. While most financial records would not be subject to the attorney-client privilege, the discussion of these records with your client may be privileged. Be warned that protecting this privileged communication may be at the discretion of the bankruptcy court.
The bankruptcy laws are constantly changing. Make sure that your fresh start is not a false start and hire an experienced and knowledgeable bankruptcy attorney who can protect your rights.
In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, a trustee is appointed to administer the case and liquidate the debtor's nonexempt assets. In performing these duties it may become important for the trustee to have certain information and the trustee may seek to have the debtor’s attorney disclose information obtained during a confidential attorney client discussion.
To compel the disclosure of this information, the trustee may invoke section 542(e) of the Bankruptcy Code which states that “[s]ubject to any applicable privilege, after notice and a hearing, the court may order an attorney, accountant, or other person that holds recorded information. . . relating to the debtor’s property or financial affairs, to turn over or disclose such recorded information to the trustee.” In opposing this disclosure, the debtor may assert the attorney-client privilege and argue that the trustee does not have the power to waive this privilege.
Bankruptcy Courts have taken three different approaches to resolving the issue of whether the trustee can waive the attorney-client privilege: (1) the trustee can waive attorney-client privilege; (2) the attorney-client privilege is absolute and cannot be waived by the trustee; and (3) whether the trustee is entitled to waive the attorney-client privilege depends upon the circumstances in the case. Bankruptcy courts using this last test generally balance the benefit to the bankruptcy estate against the potential harm to the debtor. See In re Courtney, 372 B.R. 519 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007).
The bottom line is “let the client beware!” Discussions with your bankruptcy attorney, personal injury attorney, or other attorney may be subject to disclosure during your bankruptcy case. While most financial records would not be subject to the attorney-client privilege, the discussion of these records with your client may be privileged. Be warned that protecting this privileged communication may be at the discretion of the bankruptcy court.
The bankruptcy laws are constantly changing. Make sure that your fresh start is not a false start and hire an experienced and knowledgeable bankruptcy attorney who can protect your rights.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Options When Sued Over Credit Card Debt
Receiving a lawsuit summons is a very scary thing. Whether served by a law enforcement officer, private process server, or received by mail, the idea of facing a judge and a skilled attorney is very intimidating. Fortunately, your legal options are very clear: (1) do nothing; (2) defend the law suit; (3) negotiate a settlement; or (4) file a bankruptcy.
The first option, do nothing, is obviously a bad choice. The court will enter a judgment against you and your wages may be garnished or property seized (e.g. the contents of a bank account). Even if the debt is ultimately paid or discharged in bankruptcy, the judgment will remain on your credit report for at least seven (7) years.
The second and third options, defend the law suit and/or negotiate a settlement, are very difficult to accomplish. Once the creditor has hired an attorney and filed a lawsuit there is very little that a person or non-attorney debt settlement firm can do to “settle” the debt. The collection attorney will use the legal processes to its advantage and knows that an unrepresented person is generally unable to successfully defend the lawsuit. Even the lay-person-friendly small claims process can be filled with pitfalls. Additionally, the cost of hiring an attorney and defending a lawsuit can get very expensive and the collection attorney is betting that you will not pay $3,000 to an attorney to contest a $3,000 credit card debt. The collection attorney believes (rightly) that it has the advantage and will ultimately obtain a legally enforceable judgment against you. Depending on your cardholder agreement, you may be liable for the principal, interest, penalties, court fees, and attorney fees. Why would they settle for less?
The final option, bankruptcy, is a very powerful tool. Bankruptcy immediately stops the lawsuit and prevents the entry of a judgment. Once the individual’s obligation to pay the debt is discharged by the bankruptcy court, the lawsuit must be dismissed and cannot be refilled. Filing bankruptcy prevents almost all future lawsuits from being filed and can discharge the obligation to pay most court judgments.
If you have been sued by a credit card company, discuss your situation with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. There are many options for dealing with your financial difficulty, and a bankruptcy attorney can help you select the best course of action for you and your family.
The first option, do nothing, is obviously a bad choice. The court will enter a judgment against you and your wages may be garnished or property seized (e.g. the contents of a bank account). Even if the debt is ultimately paid or discharged in bankruptcy, the judgment will remain on your credit report for at least seven (7) years.
The second and third options, defend the law suit and/or negotiate a settlement, are very difficult to accomplish. Once the creditor has hired an attorney and filed a lawsuit there is very little that a person or non-attorney debt settlement firm can do to “settle” the debt. The collection attorney will use the legal processes to its advantage and knows that an unrepresented person is generally unable to successfully defend the lawsuit. Even the lay-person-friendly small claims process can be filled with pitfalls. Additionally, the cost of hiring an attorney and defending a lawsuit can get very expensive and the collection attorney is betting that you will not pay $3,000 to an attorney to contest a $3,000 credit card debt. The collection attorney believes (rightly) that it has the advantage and will ultimately obtain a legally enforceable judgment against you. Depending on your cardholder agreement, you may be liable for the principal, interest, penalties, court fees, and attorney fees. Why would they settle for less?
The final option, bankruptcy, is a very powerful tool. Bankruptcy immediately stops the lawsuit and prevents the entry of a judgment. Once the individual’s obligation to pay the debt is discharged by the bankruptcy court, the lawsuit must be dismissed and cannot be refilled. Filing bankruptcy prevents almost all future lawsuits from being filed and can discharge the obligation to pay most court judgments.
If you have been sued by a credit card company, discuss your situation with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. There are many options for dealing with your financial difficulty, and a bankruptcy attorney can help you select the best course of action for you and your family.
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Can I Have Money in a Bank Account When I File Bankruptcy?
The two most common types of consumer bankruptcies are Chapter 7 and Chapter 13. In a Chapter 7 all of the debtor’s property is placed into an estate which is controlled by the bankruptcy trustee. While no property physically changes hands (at least not at the beginning of the case), the trustee and bankruptcy court have broad legal power over your property. If you have money in a bank account on the day you file, your bank account and money are assets of the bankruptcy estate. You are no longer free to transfer funds or assets as they now belong to the bankruptcy estate.Take for example that you have $5,000 sitting in your checking account on the day you file bankruptcy. That money is property of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate and is no longer yours to control or use. If you take the $5,000 out of the bank the day after filing to pay your mortgage payment and other bills, the Chapter 7 trustee can seek to recover those funds, either from you or from the payee.
During a Chapter 13 bankruptcy the debtor retains possession and control over his or her property, and is free to use any funds in the debtor’s bank account. An accounting is performed and the debtor’s property is classified as either exempt or non-exempt. Non-exempt property is not taken from the debtor (as is often the case in a Chapter 7), but the Chapter 13 debtor is required to pay unsecured creditors a sum equal to the amount of non-exempt equity. For instance, if there is $5,000 in the debtor’s bank account, the debtor may only be able to exempt a portion of the entire sum. The non-exempt portion must be paid to the creditors through the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan (over three to five years).
Cash in a bank account can be a problematic issue for a debtor. Avoiding these problems is the joint responsibility of the debtor and the debtor’s bankruptcy attorney. Timing is critical to minimizing your financial exposure. An experienced bankruptcy attorney can help you maximize the benefits of the bankruptcy laws and navigate around any pitfalls.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
When Your Town Goes Bust
Lately municipal bankruptcy has been the subject of many news features as economic troubles press cities to consider their legal options. San Diego and Los Angeles are two major cities that are reportedly considering federal bankruptcy protection.
While federal bankruptcy protection has been available to U.S. cities since the 1930’s, only a few hundred have actually filed. Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a financially distressed municipality the opportunity to reorganize its debts under federal protection. A “municipality” as defined in the Bankruptcy Code includes cities, counties, and special districts. This definition does not include states.
A Chapter 9 bankruptcy can only be commenced after the governing body specifically authorizes the filing. Twenty-six U.S. states have prohibited their municipalities from filing bankruptcy: Alaska, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Once filed the federal bankruptcy law’s automatic stay provision enjoins creditors from taking any collection action against the municipality. The automatic stay provides an opportunity for the municipality to raise new revenues, renegotiate contracts, or restructure its debt without pressure from creditors. Chapter 9 is tricky business for the bankruptcy court because the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and section 904 of the Bankruptcy Code prevents a federal bankruptcy court from interfering with the city’s political or governmental powers. The bankruptcy judge is largely a facilitator of the restructuring process.
The essence of a Chapter 9 bankruptcy is that it gives the municipality an opportunity to reorganize and restructure its debts through an agreement with its creditors called a “Plan of Adjustment.” If a creditor cannot agree with the municipality, Chapter 9 allows the bankruptcy court to force the municipality’s Plan of Adjustment on the non-consenting creditor. The bankrupt municipality is also empowered to accept or reject contracts and leases through the Plan of Adjustment.
Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy is a very rare and special bankruptcy case. The stigma and complexity of Chapter 9 makes it a last option for U.S. municipalities. However, if the debt problem is serious and substantial enough, the federal bankruptcy laws can protect a city of millions and give it a chance for a fresh start, just like it can protect an individual or family in financial distress.
While federal bankruptcy protection has been available to U.S. cities since the 1930’s, only a few hundred have actually filed. Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a financially distressed municipality the opportunity to reorganize its debts under federal protection. A “municipality” as defined in the Bankruptcy Code includes cities, counties, and special districts. This definition does not include states.
A Chapter 9 bankruptcy can only be commenced after the governing body specifically authorizes the filing. Twenty-six U.S. states have prohibited their municipalities from filing bankruptcy: Alaska, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Once filed the federal bankruptcy law’s automatic stay provision enjoins creditors from taking any collection action against the municipality. The automatic stay provides an opportunity for the municipality to raise new revenues, renegotiate contracts, or restructure its debt without pressure from creditors. Chapter 9 is tricky business for the bankruptcy court because the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and section 904 of the Bankruptcy Code prevents a federal bankruptcy court from interfering with the city’s political or governmental powers. The bankruptcy judge is largely a facilitator of the restructuring process.
The essence of a Chapter 9 bankruptcy is that it gives the municipality an opportunity to reorganize and restructure its debts through an agreement with its creditors called a “Plan of Adjustment.” If a creditor cannot agree with the municipality, Chapter 9 allows the bankruptcy court to force the municipality’s Plan of Adjustment on the non-consenting creditor. The bankrupt municipality is also empowered to accept or reject contracts and leases through the Plan of Adjustment.
Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy is a very rare and special bankruptcy case. The stigma and complexity of Chapter 9 makes it a last option for U.S. municipalities. However, if the debt problem is serious and substantial enough, the federal bankruptcy laws can protect a city of millions and give it a chance for a fresh start, just like it can protect an individual or family in financial distress.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Bankruptcy and Court Ordered Marital Obligations
Bankruptcy can have a serious impact on an ex-spouse. That is because a family court will often assign payment of a joint debt to one party only. In many cases the obligated party lacks the resources to pay the debt in full or to refinance it. Therefore the ex-spouse remains legally obligated to the creditor. This is often the case with automobile debt and credit cards with large balances.
A court-ordered debt to a former spouse is given special consideration by the bankruptcy laws. In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case these debts are generally non-dischargeable. An order directing payment to a third party (e.g. a mortgage payment) is also generally non-dischargeable if the payment is effectively a form of spousal support. Even an obligation to pay your ex-spouse’s attorney fees in connection with the divorce proceeding is generally non-dischargeable.
While past due support obligations are also non-dischargeable debts in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, debts not in the nature of support (e.g. a division of marital property) can be discharged. The ex-spouse must contest the debtor’s characterization of the obligation and convince the bankruptcy court that the debt is a support obligation in order to save it from discharge. If the court determines the debt is a support obligation, it must be paid by the debtor through the Chapter 13 bankruptcy.
Whether the family court-ordered obligation arises from a property division or from a support obligation, the ex-spouse will likely suffer harm from the debtor’s bankruptcy filing. The sad truth is that any non-payment of a joint monthly obligation will harm the ex-spouse’s credit report and there is little that can be done to remedy it. If the debt is discharged through the debtor’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the creditor may elect to pursue the ex-spouse and there will be no recourse against the debtor.
Regardless whether you or your ex-spouse owes a court-ordered joint obligation, if bankruptcy is in the future, you should seek professional help. It is important to evaluate the impact the bankruptcy will have on the debt and determine a course of action that will best protect you. Timing can be very critical, so consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney early.
A court-ordered debt to a former spouse is given special consideration by the bankruptcy laws. In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case these debts are generally non-dischargeable. An order directing payment to a third party (e.g. a mortgage payment) is also generally non-dischargeable if the payment is effectively a form of spousal support. Even an obligation to pay your ex-spouse’s attorney fees in connection with the divorce proceeding is generally non-dischargeable.
While past due support obligations are also non-dischargeable debts in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, debts not in the nature of support (e.g. a division of marital property) can be discharged. The ex-spouse must contest the debtor’s characterization of the obligation and convince the bankruptcy court that the debt is a support obligation in order to save it from discharge. If the court determines the debt is a support obligation, it must be paid by the debtor through the Chapter 13 bankruptcy.
Whether the family court-ordered obligation arises from a property division or from a support obligation, the ex-spouse will likely suffer harm from the debtor’s bankruptcy filing. The sad truth is that any non-payment of a joint monthly obligation will harm the ex-spouse’s credit report and there is little that can be done to remedy it. If the debt is discharged through the debtor’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the creditor may elect to pursue the ex-spouse and there will be no recourse against the debtor.
Regardless whether you or your ex-spouse owes a court-ordered joint obligation, if bankruptcy is in the future, you should seek professional help. It is important to evaluate the impact the bankruptcy will have on the debt and determine a course of action that will best protect you. Timing can be very critical, so consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney early.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
